Comparison of Y-jet and OIL effervescent atomizers based on internal and external two-phase flow characteristics
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F16%3APU121074" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/16:PU121074 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/abs/2016/09/epjconf_efm2016_02078/epjconf_efm2016_02078.html" target="_blank" >http://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/abs/2016/09/epjconf_efm2016_02078/epjconf_efm2016_02078.html</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611402078" target="_blank" >10.1051/epjconf/201611402078</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of Y-jet and OIL effervescent atomizers based on internal and external two-phase flow characteristics
Original language description
Presented paper focuses on spraying of two viscous liquids (μ = 60 and 143 mPa s) by two types of twinfluid atomizers with internal mixing. We compared the well-known Y-jet atomizer with the less known, “outside in liquid” (OIL), configuration of the effervescent atomizer. The required liquid viscosity was achieved by using the water-maltodextrin solutions of different concentrations. Both the liquids were sprayed at two gas inlet pressures (Δp = 0.14 and 0.28 MPa) and various gas-to-liquid ratios (GLR = 2.5%, 5%, 10% and 20%). The comparison was focused on four characteristics: liquid flow-rate (for the same working regimes, defined by Δp and GLR), internal flow regimes, Weber numbers of a liquid breakup (We) and droplet sizes. A high-speed camera and Malvern Spraytec laser diffraction system were used to obtain necessary experimental data. Comparing the results of our experiments, we can state that for both the liquids the OIL atomizer reached higher liquid flow-rates at corresponding working regimes, it was typical by annular internal flow and higher We in the near-nozzle region at all the working regimes. As a result, it produced considerably smaller droplets than the second tested atomizing device, especially for GLR < 10%.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20704 - Energy and fuels
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
EPJ Web of Conferences
ISBN
—
ISSN
2100-014X
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
4
Pages from-to
1-4
Publisher name
EDP sciences
Place of publication
Neuveden
Event location
Praha
Event date
Nov 17, 2015
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
000400395300080