All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Thermally activated wall panels with microencapsulated PCM: comparison of 1D and 3D models

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F19%3APU130179" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/19:PU130179 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19401493.2018.1543350" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19401493.2018.1543350</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2018.1543350" target="_blank" >10.1080/19401493.2018.1543350</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Thermally activated wall panels with microencapsulated PCM: comparison of 1D and 3D models

  • Original language description

    The paper deals with the comparison of the one-dimensional (1D) and three-dimensional (3D) models of a thermally activated wall panel with a microencapsulated phase change material. The 3D model was created in the off-the-shelf simulation tool COMSOL Multiphysics. The 1D model was an in-house developed TRNSYS type. The main advantage of the 1D model is the short computation time but it comes at the expense of lower accuracy and less detailed results. In most building performance simulations, however, detailed knowledge of the temperature distribution over the surface of a wall is not important. For this reason, the results of both models were compared in terms of the mean surface temperature of the wall panels, the outlet water temperature, and the overall heating and cooling capacity of the panels. The two models provided very similar results for the practical range of water flow rates. The mass flow rate of water had a relatively small influence on the mean surface temperature and the heating and cooling capacity of the panels. For the one-tube mass flow rates of water between 0.25 and 2 g/s, the mean surface temperature was in the range of 28–29.5 C in the heating scenario and 21–21.5C in the cooling scenario, with the heating and cooling capacity ranges of 65 W/m2 to 75 W/m2 and 35 W/m2 to 40 W/m2, respectively.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20704 - Energy and fuels

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Building Performance Simulation

  • ISSN

    1940-1493

  • e-ISSN

    1940-1507

  • Volume of the periodical

    12

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    404-419

  • UT code for WoS article

    000463106300004

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85057611456