Greenhouse gas credits from integrated waste-to-energy plant
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F20%3APU136724" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/20:PU136724 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620324550" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620324550</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122408" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122408</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Greenhouse gas credits from integrated waste-to-energy plant
Original language description
In Europe, most of the district heat is produced from fossil energy sources such as coal or natural gas. Together with the intention to divert municipal waste from landfill, which is still the main way of treatment in approximately half of the EU countries, there is a potential for the construction of waste-to-energy plants (WtEP) that can partially replace fossil fuels. An important factor in planning the construction of new WtE plants is the assessment of the project's economy. However, the ecological aspect of the project, namely the greenhouse-gas (GHG) savings, is becoming a topic of discussion nowadays. In terms of GHG savings, WtE plant integration into an existing district heating system (DHS) has a positive impact, but its level is often only roughly estimated. The paper presents a comprehensive mathematical optimization tool working on a daily time interval that is able to evaluate the impact of changing current technology or WtE plant construction on global warming potential. The technical parameters such as boiler output range, energy efficiency, etc. are considered. The tool also allows to put in the context the GHG savings and economic benefits of the project. These two factors are very difficult to compare. The study answers the question of how to deal with this issue and presents the possibility of comparison, which is generally transferable to any two parameters. Due to two poorly comparable criteria, the result does not include a single optimal solution, but clearly illustrates the view of the overall issue and gives a good basis for the final decision. The method used are illustrated in real-world DHS with various parameters where the relationship between GHG savings and the economic benefits of the integration of a WtE plant is evaluated. The whole problem is the task of linear integer programming and is implemented in the GAMS programming environment. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20704 - Energy and fuels
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF15_003%2F0000456" target="_blank" >EF15_003/0000456: Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory (SPIL)</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Cleaner Production
ISSN
0959-6526
e-ISSN
1879-1786
Volume of the periodical
270
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
1-9
UT code for WoS article
000579071300065
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85086562798