All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of the effects of multiaxis printing strategies on large-scale 3D printed surface quality, accuracy, and strength

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F22%3APU143156" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/22:PU143156 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00170-022-08685-4" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00170-022-08685-4</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08685-4" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00170-022-08685-4</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of the effects of multiaxis printing strategies on large-scale 3D printed surface quality, accuracy, and strength

  • Original language description

    The purpose of this study is to determine impact of several multi-axis 3D printing strategies on buildability, surface quality, accuracy, and strength of large scale single-walled object (printed in a so called vase mode). To achieve this goal, test objects were printed using four different printing strategies by an industrial robotic arm and a pellet-fed screw extruder. The strategies tested in this study are regular 3-axis deposition with planar layers, 5-axis deposition with planar layers, 3-axis deposition with nonplanar layers, and 5-axis deposition with nonplanar layers. Custom scripts for nonplanar slicing and for tilt control during multiaxis printing were developed to achieve these prints and are explained in this study. The results were evaluated using 3D scanning and mechanical testing, and surface accuracy, surface roughness, and layer adhesion strength were compared. The most important findings are (1) 5-axis motion alone does not improve the results of the printing; (2) while nonplanar printing can improve surface quality, its usability is geometry dependent; and (3) multi-axis nonplanar printing, even with partial tilt (30 degrees) can expand printability with enhanced quality to at least 75 degrees overhang angle. The future potential of these methods and the requirements to achieve them are discussed.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20205 - Automation and control systems

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

  • ISSN

    0268-3768

  • e-ISSN

    1433-3015

  • Volume of the periodical

    119

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    11-12

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    7109-7120

  • UT code for WoS article

    000745822300003

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85123468482