All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Carbon footprint of fresh sea cucumbers in China: Comparison of three aquaculture technologies

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F24%3APU155982" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/24:PU155982 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624026982#kwrds0010" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624026982#kwrds0010</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143249" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143249</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Carbon footprint of fresh sea cucumbers in China: Comparison of three aquaculture technologies

  • Original language description

    Facing China's strict greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction policy including the Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals, the GHG emissions from sea cucumber aquaculture have been attracting increasing attention. In order to promote the low-carbon development of marine aquaculture, this study provides a comparative evaluation of the carbon footprint of 1 t fresh sea cucumber production from cradle-to-gate based on three different aquaculture technologies: marine bottom-sowing aquaculture, marine cage aquaculture, and pond bottom-sowing aquaculture. The hotspots of GHG emissions at key stages of sea cucumber aquaculture are also analyzed. The results showed that the carbon footprint of 1 t of fresh sea cucumber production varies based on different aquaculture technologies, with marine bottom-sowing aquaculture technology having the highest carbon footprint at 6936.5 kg CO2eq, followed by marine cage aquaculture technology at 5148.7 kg CO2eq and pond bottom-sowing aquaculture technology at 2914.1 kg CO2eq. When comparing the GHG emissions of different stages, the growing seedling stage is the hotspot of marine bottom-sowing aquaculture technology, with the main sources of GHG emissions being electricity used for maintaining suitable water temperature and bait preparation. The hotspots of marine cage aquaculture technology and pond bottom-sowing aquaculture technology are both centered around the adult sea cucumber feeding stage, where bait consumption becomes the primary source of GHG emissions. Sensitivity analysis indicates that increasing seedling survival rates, reducing electricity consumption, and implementing renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power can effectively mitigate the GHG emissions associated with sea cucumber aquaculture.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF15_003%2F0000456" target="_blank" >EF15_003/0000456: Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory (SPIL)</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION

  • ISSN

    0959-6526

  • e-ISSN

    1879-1786

  • Volume of the periodical

    neuveden

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    469

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    „“-„“

  • UT code for WoS article

    001284375100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85199910378