On the effect of mechanical loading method on rectangular concrete specimen electromagnetic and acoustic emission signals
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26220%2F07%3APU70344" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26220/07:PU70344 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
čeština
Original language name
Vliv způsobu mechanického zatěžování betonových vzorků na signály elektromagnetické a akustické emise
Original language description
The paper deals with the generation of electromagnetic emission (EME) and acoustic emission (AE) response, which results from the load being applied to rectangular concrete specimens in two different ways. In the first case, the specimen is stressed by aplain pressure exerted by the pressing machine jaws on it. In the second case, rectangular steel blocks of a width of 6 mm are inserted between the specimen and the jaws. Typical EME and AE response waveforms appear not to differ from each other for either of the loading methods. However, a significant difference is observed in the frequency distribution of the time lag of the acoustic signal behind the electromagnetic one. This fact results from the difference in the distance between the crack generation point and the AE pickup device location for the two loading methods. This result is in a good agreement with the theoretic model prediction.
Czech name
Vliv způsobu mechanického zatěžování betonových vzorků na signály elektromagnetické a akustické emise
Czech description
The paper deals with the generation of electromagnetic emission (EME) and acoustic emission (AE) response, which results from the load being applied to rectangular concrete specimens in two different ways. In the first case, the specimen is stressed by aplain pressure exerted by the pressing machine jaws on it. In the second case, rectangular steel blocks of a width of 6 mm are inserted between the specimen and the jaws. Typical EME and AE response waveforms appear not to differ from each other for either of the loading methods. However, a significant difference is observed in the frequency distribution of the time lag of the acoustic signal behind the electromagnetic one. This fact results from the difference in the distance between the crack generation point and the AE pickup device location for the two loading methods. This result is in a good agreement with the theoretic model prediction.
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
BM - Solid-state physics and magnetism
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA103%2F06%2F0708" target="_blank" >GA103/06/0708: Acoustic and electromagnetic emission in materials research</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)
Others
Publication year
2007
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Experiment 2007
ISBN
978-80-7204-543-3
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
6
Pages from-to
211-216
Publisher name
CERM
Place of publication
Brno, Česká republika
Event location
Brno, VUT-FAST
Event date
Oct 25, 2007
Type of event by nationality
CST - Celostátní akce
UT code for WoS article
—