Comparison of Lossless Image Formats

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26230%2F21%3APU142940" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26230/21:PU142940 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://www.fit.vut.cz/research/publication/12567/" target="_blank" >https://www.fit.vut.cz/research/publication/12567/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24132/CSRN.2021.3002.38" target="_blank" >10.24132/CSRN.2021.3002.38</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Comparison of Lossless Image Formats

Original language description

In recent years, a bag with image and video compression formats has been torn. However, most of them are focused on lossy compression and only marginally support the lossless mode. In this paper, I will focus on lossless formats and the critical question: "Which one is the most efficient?" It turned out that FLIF is currently the most efficient format for lossless image compression. This finding is in contrast to that FLIF developers stopped its development in favor of JPEG XL.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

D - Article in proceedings

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Project

<a href="/en/project/TH04010144" target="_blank" >TH04010144: AI for Traffic and Industry Vision</a><br>

Continuities

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year

2021

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Article name in the collection

WSCG 2021 Proceedings

ISBN

978-80-86943-34-3

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Number of pages

4

Pages from-to

339-342

Publisher name

Union Agency

Place of publication

Plzen

Event location

Plzeň

Event date

May 17, 2021

Type of event by nationality

WRD - Celosvětová akce

UT code for WoS article

—