All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

LLMs vs Established Text Augmentation Techniques for Classification: When do the Benefits Outweight the Costs?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26230%2F26%3A0193745" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26230/26:0193745 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-long.526/" target="_blank" >https://aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-long.526/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.526" target="_blank" >10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.526</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    LLMs vs Established Text Augmentation Techniques for Classification: When do the Benefits Outweight the Costs?

  • Original language description

    The generative large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used for data augmentation tasks, where text samples are LLM-paraphrased and then used for classifier fine-tuning. Previous studies have compared LLM-based augmentations with established augmentation techniques, but the results are contradictory: some report superiority of LLM-based augmentations, while other only marginal increases (and even decreases) in performance of downstream classifiers. A research that would confirm a clear cost-benefit advantage of LLMs over more established augmentation methods is largely missing. To study if (and when) is the LLM-based augmentation advantageous, we compared the effects of recent LLM augmentation methods with established ones on 6 datasets, 3 classifiers and 2 fine-tuning methods. We also varied the number of seeds and collected samples to better explore the downstream model accuracy space. Finally, we performed a cost-benefit analysis and show that LLM-based methods are worthy of deployment only when very small number of seeds is used. Moreover, in many cases, established methods lead to similar or better model accuracies.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)

  • ISBN

    979-8-8917-6189-6

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    10476-10496

  • Publisher name

    Association for Computational Linguistics

  • Place of publication

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • Event location

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • Event date

    Apr 29, 2025

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    001611654000207