Loos after Loos: What Happened to the Raumplan After 1933?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26420%2F21%3APU140200" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26420/21:PU140200 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM7fJRisCWI&t=4s" target="_blank" >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM7fJRisCWI&t=4s</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Loos after Loos: What Happened to the Raumplan After 1933?
Original language description
In 1931, the Vienna publishing house Anton Schroll & Co. published Heinrich Kulka’s extensive monograph on Adolf Loos. In his text, Kulka discussed Loos’s idea of being an architect, he wrote about ornament and the reduction of ornament, and then, on about one page, he outlined Loos’s space concept, which he named “raumplan”. After Loos’s death in 1933, many of his apprentices continued designing “in the Loos manner”, as Heinrich Kulka promoted his projects from the mid-1930s. What was the real purpose of the invention and use of the term “raumplan“ by Loos’s pupils and has there been anything like that after Loos’s death? The lecture will try to answer this question using examples of post-Loos works by Heinrich Kulka and Kurt Unger from 1933 to 1939.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60401 - Arts, Art history
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů