Qualitative models of complex sustainability systems using integrations of equations and equationless knowledge items generated by several experts
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26510%2F16%3APU117792" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26510/16:PU117792 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.030" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.030</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.030" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.030</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Qualitative models of complex sustainability systems using integrations of equations and equationless knowledge items generated by several experts
Original language description
Highly non-linear, partially subjective, inconsistent, vague and multidimensional sustainability systems are often prohibitively difficult to study using numerical and/or verbal and consequently fuzzy quantifiers. Oversimplified or highly specific quantitative models are sometimes obtained and their practical applicability is therefore limited. Moreover, definitions of some ecological and consequently sustainability indicators are unclear and difficult to quantify by their very nature. This is the reason why the least information intensive descriptions must be incorporated into sustainability models developments. Time trends, e.g. increasing, are such information non-intensive descriptors. There are just three trend/qualitative values used to quantify variables and their derivatives: plus/increasing; zero/constant; negative/decreasing. The qualitative quantifiers are the key elements of qualitative models. Qualitative sustainability knowledge items are available in forms of equations with unknown numerical values of relevant constants and in equationless forms such as heuristics. For example – the unsteady state behaviour of a temperature is described by a dumped oscillation equation, however, the relevant equation's constants are not known; return on equity is increasing more and more rapidly. A qualitative model must be developed when the relevant complex quantitative model must be heavily simplified. The key information input in sustainability analysis is expert knowledge. A consensus among experts is often not reached because of substantial subjectivity of experts’ knowledge. Qualitative model solutions are discrete sets of scenarios. Different unions U and intersections ∩ of sets of qualitative solutions can be used to model unachievable consensuses among experts to identify a meaningful compromise. The case study presents a model generated by one expert. It is based on integration of one qualitative equation and 23 equationless relations using 13 variables e.g
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA14-23079S" target="_blank" >GA14-23079S: Measuring Corporate Sustainability in Selected Sectors</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
ISSN
1470-160X
e-ISSN
1872-7034
Volume of the periodical
2016
Issue of the periodical within the volume
62
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
201-211
UT code for WoS article
000370454600020
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84951204238