Influence of baseline subtraction on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopic data
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26620%2F18%3APU129239" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26620/18:PU129239 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/ja/c8ja00209f#!divAbstract" target="_blank" >https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/ja/c8ja00209f#!divAbstract</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8JA00209F" target="_blank" >10.1039/C8JA00209F</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Influence of baseline subtraction on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopic data
Original language description
Spectra acquired by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy comprise both a valuable analyte signal and an undesired background signal originating from various sources. The latter is commonly suppressed, at least partially, by gating of the signal acquisition, or treated numerically during the data processing. The numerical treatment might lead to loss of information or introduction of spectral artefacts, depending on the applied methodology. Consequently, background subtraction might significantly influence both univariate and multivariate analysis of the LIBS data. While various baseline correction methods have recently been studied and compared for multivariate LIBS analysis, their influence on LIBS data remains unexplored. Therefore, the present work aims to elucidate the effects of numerical background estimation and subtraction on LIBS data in terms of limits of detection estimated by the signal-to-noise ratio method, considering several fundamentally different background estimation algorithms: polynomial fitting, heuristic estimation, wavelet smoothing, and non-parametric modelling. A threshold gate delay value was observed above which the numerical treatment of spectral background has to be done cautiously. In addition, it was found that the optimal measurement parameters and selection of the emission line yielding the best results dependon the planned spectral processing.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10306 - Optics (including laser optics and quantum optics)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/LQ1601" target="_blank" >LQ1601: CEITEC 2020</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
ISSN
0267-9477
e-ISSN
1364-5544
Volume of the periodical
33
Issue of the periodical within the volume
-
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
2107-2115
UT code for WoS article
000451536000007
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85057518426