Cystic renal oncocytoma and tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma: morphologic and immunohistochemical comparative study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00669806%3A_____%2F16%3A10324173" target="_blank" >RIV/00669806:_____/16:10324173 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11140/16:10324173
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000000156" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000000156</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000000156" target="_blank" >10.1097/PAI.0000000000000156</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Cystic renal oncocytoma and tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma: morphologic and immunohistochemical comparative study
Original language description
Renal oncocytoma (RO) may present with a tubulocystic growth in 3% to 7% of cases, and in such cases its morphology may significantly overlap with tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma (TCRCC). We compared the morphologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of these tumors, aiming to clarify the differential diagnostic criteria, which facilitate the discrimination of RO from TCRCC. Twenty-four cystic ROs and 15 TCRCCs were selected and analyzed for: architectural growth patterns, stromal features, cytomorphology, ISUP nucleolar grade, necrosis, and mitotic activity. Immunohistochemical panel included various cytokeratins (AE1-AE3, OSCAR, CAM5.2, CK7), vimentin, CD10, CD117, AMACR, CA-IX, antimitochondrial antigen (MIA), EMA, and Ki-67. The presence of at least focal solid growth and islands of tumor cells interspersed with loose stroma, lower ISUP nucleolar grade, absence of necrosis, and absence of mitotic figures were strongly suggestive of a cystic RO. In contrast, the absence of solid and island growth patterns and presence of more compact, fibrous stroma, accompanied by higher ISUP nucleolar grade, focal necrosis, and mitotic figures were all associated with TCRCC. TCRCC marked more frequently for vimentin, CD10, AMACR, and CK7 and had a higher proliferative index by Ki-67 (>15%). CD117 was negative in 14/15 cases. One case was weakly CD117 reactive with cytoplasmic positivity. All cystic RO cases were strongly positive for CD117. The remaining markers (AE1-AE3, CAM5.2, OSCAR, CA-IX,MIA, EMA) were of limited utility. Presence of tumor cell islands and solid growth areas and the type of stroma may be major morphologic criteria in differentiating cystic RO from TCRCC. In difficult cases, or when a limited tissue precludes full morphologic assessment, immunohistochemical pattern of vimentin, CD10, CD117, AMACR, CK7, and Ki-67 could help in establishing the correct diagnosis.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FP - Other medical fields
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/ED2.1.00%2F03.0076" target="_blank" >ED2.1.00/03.0076: Biomedical Centre of the Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Applied Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology
ISSN
1541-2016
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
24
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
112-119
UT code for WoS article
000372852400005
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84958059677