All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Patient Satisfaction with General versus Local Anesthesia during Carotid Endarterectomy

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00669806%3A_____%2F19%3A10393995" target="_blank" >RIV/00669806:_____/19:10393995 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216208:11140/19:10393995

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Glzufd47Yw" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Glzufd47Yw</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688692" target="_blank" >10.1055/s-0039-1688692</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Patient Satisfaction with General versus Local Anesthesia during Carotid Endarterectomy

  • Original language description

    BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Both general and local anesthesia are used in our department for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The decision as to which anesthetic technique to use during surgery is made individually. The aim of our study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and preference with the anesthesia type used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The satisfaction of a group of 205 patients with regard to anesthesia used and their future preferences were evaluated prospectively through a questionnaire. The reasons for dissatisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: CEA was performed under general anesthesia (GA) in 159 cases (77.6%) and under local anesthesia (LA) in 46 cases (22.4%). In the GA group, 148 patients (93.1%) were satisfied; 30 patients (65.2%) in the LA group were satisfied ( p &lt; 0.0001). The reason for dissatisfaction with GA were postoperative nausea and vomiting (7 patients), postoperative psychological alteration (3), and fear of GA (1). The reasons for dissatisfaction with LA were intraoperative pain (9 patients), intraoperative discomfort and stress (5), and intraoperative breathing problems (2). Of the GA group, 154 (96.9%) patients would prefer GA again, and of the LA group, 28 (60.9%) patients would prefer LA if operated on again ( p &lt; 0.0001). Overall, 172 patients (83.9%) would prefer GA in the future, and 33 patients (16.1%) would prefer LA. CONCLUSION: Overall patient satisfaction with CEA performed under both GA and LA is high. Nevertheless, in the GA group, patient satisfaction and future preference were significantly higher. Both GA and LA have advantages and disadvantages for CEA. An optimal approach is to make use of both anesthetic techniques based on their individual indications and patient preference. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart . New York.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery

  • ISSN

    2193-6315

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    80

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    4

  • Pages from-to

    341-344

  • UT code for WoS article

    000483846800002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85071320048