Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study)
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00669806%3A_____%2F21%3A10429482" target="_blank" >RIV/00669806:_____/21:10429482 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11140/21:10429482 RIV/61989592:15110/21:73607001
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=DYa.SQa-~S" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=DYa.SQa-~S</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01208-5" target="_blank" >10.1186/s12905-021-01208-5</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study)
Original language description
BackgroundAbdominal and laparoscopic sacro-colpopexy (LSC) is considered the standard surgical option for the management of a symptomatic apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Women who have their uterus, and for whom an LSC is indicated, can have a laparoscopic sacro-hysteropexy (LSH), a laparoscopic supra-cervical hysterectomy and laparoscopic sacro-cervicopexy (LSCH+LSC) or a total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic sacro-colpopexy (TLH+LSC). The main aim of this study was to compare clinical and patient reported outcomes of uterine sparing versus concomitant hysterectomy LSC procedures.MethodsA retrospective analysis of clinical, imaging and patient reported outcomes at baseline, 3 and 12 months after LSH versus either LSCH+LSC or TLH+LSC between January 2015 and January 2019 in a tertiary referral urogynecology center in Pilsen, the Czech Republic.ResultsIn total, 294 women were included in this analysis (LSH n=43, LSCH+LSC n=208 and TLH+LSC n=43). There were no differences in the incidence of perioperative injuries and complications. There were no statistically significant differences between the concomitant hysterectomy and the uterine sparing groups in any of the operative, clinical or patient reported outcomes except for a significantly lower anterior compartment failure rate (p=0.017) and higher optimal mesh placement rate at 12 months in women who had concomitant hysterectomy procedures (p=0.006).ConclusionLSH seems to be associated with higher incidence of anterior compartment failures and suboptimal mesh placement based on postoperative imaging techniques compared to LSC with concomitant hysterectomy.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
BMC Women's Health
ISSN
1472-6874
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
21
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
72
UT code for WoS article
000620907900002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85101021612