All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study)

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00669806%3A_____%2F21%3A10429482" target="_blank" >RIV/00669806:_____/21:10429482 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216208:11140/21:10429482 RIV/61989592:15110/21:73607001

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=DYa.SQa-~S" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=DYa.SQa-~S</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01208-5" target="_blank" >10.1186/s12905-021-01208-5</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study)

  • Original language description

    BackgroundAbdominal and laparoscopic sacro-colpopexy (LSC) is considered the standard surgical option for the management of a symptomatic apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Women who have their uterus, and for whom an LSC is indicated, can have a laparoscopic sacro-hysteropexy (LSH), a laparoscopic supra-cervical hysterectomy and laparoscopic sacro-cervicopexy (LSCH+LSC) or a total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic sacro-colpopexy (TLH+LSC). The main aim of this study was to compare clinical and patient reported outcomes of uterine sparing versus concomitant hysterectomy LSC procedures.MethodsA retrospective analysis of clinical, imaging and patient reported outcomes at baseline, 3 and 12 months after LSH versus either LSCH+LSC or TLH+LSC between January 2015 and January 2019 in a tertiary referral urogynecology center in Pilsen, the Czech Republic.ResultsIn total, 294 women were included in this analysis (LSH n=43, LSCH+LSC n=208 and TLH+LSC n=43). There were no differences in the incidence of perioperative injuries and complications. There were no statistically significant differences between the concomitant hysterectomy and the uterine sparing groups in any of the operative, clinical or patient reported outcomes except for a significantly lower anterior compartment failure rate (p=0.017) and higher optimal mesh placement rate at 12 months in women who had concomitant hysterectomy procedures (p=0.006).ConclusionLSH seems to be associated with higher incidence of anterior compartment failures and suboptimal mesh placement based on postoperative imaging techniques compared to LSC with concomitant hysterectomy.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    BMC Women&apos;s Health

  • ISSN

    1472-6874

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    21

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    72

  • UT code for WoS article

    000620907900002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85101021612