All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Sialoendoscopy, sialography, and ultrasound: a comparison of diagnostic methods

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F16%3AE0105901" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/16:E0105901 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0081" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0081</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0081" target="_blank" >10.1515/med-2016-0081</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Sialoendoscopy, sialography, and ultrasound: a comparison of diagnostic methods

  • Original language description

    Objective: To compare the accuracy of ultrasound, sialography, and sialendoscopy for examining benign salivary gland obstructions. Methods: In this prospective study, patients with symptoms of obstruction of the major salivary gland duct system presenting at the ENT Clinic University Hospital, Ostrava, from June 2010 to December 2013 were included. All patients (n=76) underwent ultrasound, sialography, and sialoendoscopy. The signs of sialolithiasis, ductal stenosis, or normal findings were recorded after the examinations. Statistical analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of all the methods was performed, as well as a comparison of the accuracy of each method for different kinds of pathology (sialolithiasis or stenosis). Results: The sensitivity of ultrasound, sialography, and sialoendoscopy for sialolithiasis findings were 71.9%, 86.7 %, and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity of sialography and sialoendoscopy for stenosis of the duct was 69.0%, and 100%, respectively. The study showed impossibility of ultrasonic diagnostics of ductal stenosis. The sensitivity of sialoendoscopy for both pathologies was significantly higher than that from ultrasound or sialography (p<0.05). The specificity of sialoendoscopy was significantly higher than that from by ultrasound or sialography (p<0.05). Conclusion: Sialoendoscopy was the most accurate method for examination ductal pathology, with significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than by ultrasound or sialography.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    FF - ENT (ie. ear, nose, throat), ophthalmology, dentistry

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/NT13505" target="_blank" >NT13505: The Position of Sialendoscopy in the Examination and Treatment of Salivary Glands</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Open Medicine

  • ISSN

    2391-5463

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    11

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    n. 1

  • Country of publishing house

    PL - POLAND

  • Number of pages

    4

  • Pages from-to

    "p. 461-464"

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database