Interrater agreement and detection accuracy for medium-vessel occlusions using single-phase and multiphase CT angiography
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F22%3AE0109365" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/22:E0109365 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/22:00125091
Result on the web
<a href="http://www.ajnr.org/content/ajnr/43/1/93.full.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.ajnr.org/content/ajnr/43/1/93.full.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7361" target="_blank" >10.3174/ajnr.A7361</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Interrater agreement and detection accuracy for medium-vessel occlusions using single-phase and multiphase CT angiography
Original language description
Background and purpose: Accurate and reliable detection of medium-vessel occlusions is important to establish the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and initiate appropriate treatment with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy. However, medium-vessel occlusions are often challenging to detect, especially for unexperienced readers. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interrater agreement of the detection of medium-vessel occlusions using single-phase and multiphase CTA. Materials and methods: Single-phase and multiphase CTA of 120 patients with acute ischemic stroke (20 with no occlusion, 44 with large-vessel occlusion, and 56 with medium-vessel occlusion in the anterior and posterior circulation) were assessed by 3 readers with varying levels of experience (session 1: single-phase CTA; session 2: multiphase CTA). Interrater agreement for occlusion type (large-vessel occlusion versus medium-vessel occlusion versus no occlusion) and for detailed occlusion sites was calculated using the Fleiss ? with 95% confidence intervals. Accuracy for the detection of medium-vessel occlusions was calculated for each reader using classification tables. Results: Interrater agreement for occlusion type was moderate for single-phase CTA (? = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.56-0.62) and almost perfect for multiphase CTA (? = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.78-0.83). Interrater agreement for detailed occlusion sites was moderate for single-phase CTA (? = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.53-0.56) and substantial for multiphase CTA (? = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.67-0.74). On single-phase CTA, readers 1, 2, and 3 classified 33/56 (59%), 34/56 (61%), and 32/56 (57%) correctly as medium-vessel occlusions. On multiphase CTA, 48/56 (86%), 50/56 (89%), and 50/56 (89%) medium-vessel occlusions were classified correctly. Conclusions: Interrater agreement for medium-vessel occlusions is moderate when using single-phase CTA and almost perfect with multiphase CTA. Detection accuracy is substantially higher with multiphase CTA compared...
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30210 - Clinical neurology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
American journal of neuroradiology
ISSN
0195-6108
e-ISSN
1936-959X
Volume of the periodical
43
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
5
Pages from-to
93-97
UT code for WoS article
000722313700001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85123651406