Endoscopic two-port technique for orbital tumours: combined transnasal and sublabial approach

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F22%3AE0110038" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/22:E0110038 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/61988987:17110/22:A2302J69

Result on the web

<a href="https://journals.viamedica.pl/neurologia_neurochirurgia_polska/article/view/90436" target="_blank" >https://journals.viamedica.pl/neurologia_neurochirurgia_polska/article/view/90436</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/PJNNS.a2022.0071" target="_blank" >10.5603/PJNNS.a2022.0071</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Endoscopic two-port technique for orbital tumours: combined transnasal and sublabial approach

Original language description

Introduction: The aim of this study was to present the indications for a combined endoscopic transnasal and sublabial transantral approach for the surgical treatment of orbital lesions. Material and methods: This case study enrolled 10 patients scheduled for endoscopic transnasal surgery for treating orbital lesions from 2009 to 2020. When the tumour was localised to the medial part of the orbit, patients underwent endoscopy with a transnasal mononostril approach. Alternatively, when the tumour was localised to the mediocaudal part of the orbit, and when instrument manoeuvreability was limited, the transnasal approach was combined with a sublabial transantral approach. Herein, we evaluate the indications, complications, and advantages of monoportal and combined two-portal approaches. Results: 8/10 patients (80%) underwent surgery with the transnasal mononostril approach, and 2/10 (20%) underwent surgery with the combined transnasal mononostril and sublabial transantral approach. In the two latter cases, visualisation of the operation field was excellent, and there was adequate room for manipulating instruments. Conclusions: The combined mononostril-transantral approach provided the space necessary to manoeuvre instruments and to visualise the surgical field in treating mediocaudal orbital lesions. Clinical implications: This two-portal approach enables extensive resections of intraconal lesions. It should be considered to be a suitable and safer alternative to the binostril approach.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30206 - Otorhinolaryngology

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2022

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

ISSN

0028-3843

e-ISSN

1897-4260

Volume of the periodical

56

Issue of the periodical within the volume

6

Country of publishing house

PL - POLAND

Number of pages

5

Pages from-to

503-507

UT code for WoS article

000907156800001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85145242406