Fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation: a convolutional neural network - based model on sparsely annotated MRI
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F23%3AE0110263" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/23:E0110263 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/61383082:_____/23:00001305 RIV/68407700:21230/23:00366749 RIV/61988987:17110/23:A2402O0Q RIV/00216208:11110/23:10465399 RIV/00216208:11120/23:43925986
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10143-023-02014-3" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10143-023-02014-3</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02014-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10143-023-02014-3</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation: a convolutional neural network - based model on sparsely annotated MRI
Original language description
This study aims to develop a fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that can work without user interaction and evaluate its accuracy and utility for clinical applications. We trained two independent artificial neural networks on MRI scans of 394 patients. The scans were acquired according to various imaging protocols over the course of 11 years on 1.5T and 3T MRI systems. The segmentation model assigned a class label to each input pixel (pituitary adenoma, internal carotid artery, normal pituitary gland, background). The slice segmentation model classified slices as clinically relevant (structures of interest in slice) or irrelevant (anterior or posterior to sella turcica). We used MRI data of another 99 patients to evaluate the performance of the model during training. We validated the model on a prospective cohort of 28 patients, Dice coefficients of 0.910, 0.719, and 0.240 for tumour, internal carotid artery, and normal gland labels, respectively, were achieved. The slice selection model achieved 82.5% accuracy, 88.7% sensitivity, 76.7% specificity, and an AUC of 0.904. A human expert rated 71.4% of the segmentation results as accurate, 21.4% as slightly inaccurate, and 7.1% as coarsely inaccurate. Our model achieved good results comparable with recent works of other authors on the largest dataset to date and generalized well for various imaging protocols. We discussed future clinical applications, and their considerations. Models and frameworks for clinical use have yet to be developed and evaluated.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30224 - Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF16_019%2F0000765" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000765: Research Center for Informatics</a><br>
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Neurosurgical review
ISSN
0344-5607
e-ISSN
1437-2320
Volume of the periodical
46
Issue of the periodical within the volume
article 116
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
1-11
UT code for WoS article
000985819900001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85158846436