All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer - Can it be trusted?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F23%3AE0110314" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/23:E0110314 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61988987:17110/23:A2402L1S

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X23002759?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X23002759?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer - Can it be trusted?

  • Original language description

    Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor. Method: This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer. Results: Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 ± 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant. The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in "primary surgery" subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0. Conclusions: MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia).

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30224 - Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    European journal of radiology

  • ISSN

    0720-048X

  • e-ISSN

    1872-7727

  • Volume of the periodical

    165

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    article 110961

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    5

  • Pages from-to

    1-5

  • UT code for WoS article

    001039298000001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85164432309