Effect of respiratory physiotherapy on symptom severity in clinical laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: A controlled study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F25%3AE0111991" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/25:E0111991 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/61988987:17110/25:A2603DL3 RIV/61989592:15510/25:73632012 RIV/00098892:_____/25:10159536
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09775-1" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09775-1</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09775-1" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00405-025-09775-1</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Effect of respiratory physiotherapy on symptom severity in clinical laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: A controlled study
Original language description
Purpose: Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has demonstrated efficacy in improving symptoms and oesophageal sphincter function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, evidence for its use in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), a related but distinct condition, remains limited and inconclusive. We aim to assess the efficacy of an eight-week respiratory physiotherapy program – comprising IMT and diaphragmatic breathing – in reducing symptom severity in patients with clinical LPR. Methods: In this prospective, controlled clinical study, 37 patients with clinical LPR were allocated into three groups: a control group receiving dietary and pharmacological treatment and intervention groups receiving the same treatment supplemented with respiratory physiotherapy using either Threshold IMT or Airofit. Maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) was used to evaluate inspiratory muscle strength. Symptom severity was measured using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ) at baseline and after 8 weeks.Results: Both experimental groups showed a significant increase in inspiratory muscle strength (36.3% for Airofit, p = 0.005; 38.3% for Threshold IMT, p < 0.001), unlike the control group (p = 0.260). RSI scores decreased significantly in all groups but was more pronounced in the intervention groups compared to the control group (p < 0.05). HARQ scores improved across all groups without any significant between-group difference. Conclusions: Standard care supplemented with respiratory physiotherapy integrating IMT significantly reduced symptom severity in LPR. Both the Threshold IMT and Airofit devices proved effective. These findings support respiratory physiotherapy as a feasible, non-pharmacological therapeutic option in LPR management.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30206 - Otorhinolaryngology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology and Head & Neck
ISSN
0937-4477
e-ISSN
1434-4726
Volume of the periodical
282
Issue of the periodical within the volume
11
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
5805-5813
UT code for WoS article
001595129700001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105019352856