All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Pain and recovery after robotic vs. uniportal lobectomy for lung cancer: a comparative analysis

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F25%3AE0112026" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/25:E0112026 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61988987:17310/25:A2603BYG

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12083-8" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12083-8</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12083-8" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00464-025-12083-8</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Pain and recovery after robotic vs. uniportal lobectomy for lung cancer: a comparative analysis

  • Original language description

    Background: Minimally invasive thoracic surgery techniques, such as robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS), have revolutionized lung cancer treatment. However, comparative data on postoperative pain and functional recovery remain limited. This cohort study evaluates differences in pain intensity and pain-related activity limitations following radical lobectomy for lung cancer. Methods: A total of 140 patients undergoing lobectomy (70 RATS, 70 UVATS) were prospectively assessed. Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional impact was evaluated with the Daily Activity Pain Interference Questionnaire (DAPIQ) on postoperative days 3 and 14. Demographic factors, including sex and body mass index (BMI), were analyzed as potential modifiers. Results: Patients in the RATS group reported significantly higher VAS scores compared to the UVATS group on postoperative day 3 (5.8 ± 2.0 vs. 3.8 ± 1.6; p < 0.001) and day 14 (2.7 ± 1.1 vs. 2.2 ± 1.1; p = 0.001). Only 17.1% of RATS patients were pain-free by day 14, compared to 34.3% in the UVATS group (p = 0.016). The likelihood of pain-related activity interference was 3.8 times higher in the RATS group. Female sex and lower BMI were associated with worse pain outcomes. VAS scores strongly correlated with DAPIQ results (ß = 0.43). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that RATS is associated with significantly greater postoperative pain and functional limitations than UVATS following lobectomy for lung cancer. These findings underscore the importance of tailored pain management strategies in robotic thoracic surgery, particularly for higher-risk subgroups. Integration of the DAPIQ questionnaire into routine postoperative care may enhance functional recovery monitoring.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30212 - Surgery

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Surgical endoscopy

  • ISSN

    0930-2794

  • e-ISSN

    1432-2218

  • Volume of the periodical

    39

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    11

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    7181-7190

  • UT code for WoS article

    001558459700001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105014026347