Machinability the AISI 316 stainless steel after processing by various methods of 3D printing
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F07333536%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000010" target="_blank" >RIV/07333536:_____/19:N0000010 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/68407700:21220/19:00334947
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2019_11_2019091" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2019_11_2019091</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2019_11_2019091" target="_blank" >10.17973/MMSJ.2019_11_2019091</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Machinability the AISI 316 stainless steel after processing by various methods of 3D printing
Original language description
The importance of the 3D metal printing parts still increases in many branches of production not only for prototyping. The metal prints need machining very often to obtain specific shape, accurate dimensions as well as superior surface roughness. Internal structure of 3D metal prints differs from workpiece made by conventional processes like a rolling process. That leads to different mechanical properties and machinability of the same material grade but after different way made metal 3D printed specimen. This paper is focused on the milling of the stainless steel AISI 316L. The relative machinability of the various preparations of specimens from this material were investigated. The default standard was a rolled specimen and it was compared with a Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) specimen and a Laser powder cladding (LPC) process specimen. The cutting forces and roughness of a machined surface were measured. The hardness and material analysis were made to inspect the material properties of the 3D printed specimens and standard. A relative machinability was evaluated and both 3D printed specimens were compared with the rolled standard. The effect of the hardness of tested specimens on cutting forces was investigated and the correlation between them was evaluated. Different chemical composition and material structure manifested itself as the increased variability of force values on the measured length and with small hollows in the surface profile after machining for printed specimens. The different internal structure of printed specimens led to the worse machinability compared to the rolled specimen of AISI 316L in case of surface roughness.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20301 - Mechanical engineering
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF16_026%2F0008404" target="_blank" >EF16_026/0008404: Machine Tools and Precision Engineering</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
MM Science Journal
ISSN
1803-1269
e-ISSN
1805-0476
Volume of the periodical
2019
Issue of the periodical within the volume
November
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
3338-3346
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85075087502