Propagation of selected pear and quince rootstocks by hardwood cuttings
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F25271121%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000019" target="_blank" >RIV/25271121:_____/16:N0000019 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://acta.mendelu.cz/64/4/1211/" target="_blank" >https://acta.mendelu.cz/64/4/1211/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664031211" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664031211</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Propagation of selected pear and quince rootstocks by hardwood cuttings
Original language description
As long as new rootstocks continue to be developed, there will always the need for new genotypes to be controlled and evaluated. This study involves verification of selected rootstocks with reference to growth, propagation ability and other characteristics. Different rootstocks, different growth stimulators and different kinds of cuttings techniques were adopted for these experiments. Stimulators used for evaluations included: 1 % Racine (2.5 % naphthalene acetic acid - NAA), 0.5 % Rhizopon AA (2.5 % indole-3-butyric acid - IBA) and 0.25 % IBA in 50 % ethanol solution. There were three sets of experiments in all. In Experiment 1, the bases of cuttings were treated with the stimulators and part of them was also treated with heat before planting. Results from Experiment 1 indicated that cuttings treated with Rhizopon AA produced the best effect after heat treatment (with an overall average of 36.9 % of rooted cuttings). Pyrodwarf (78.7 %), Cydomalus (73.9 %) and Pyroplus (60.6 %) were the best performing rootstocks among the evaluated ones. In Experiment 2, we evaluated the influence of the date of harvesting the cuttings on rooting (comparisons were made between cuttings prepared in December [early] and March [late]). For BA29 rootstock cuttings, the best performance was attained by cuttings taken in March. The difference in rooting between March and December was 43.9 %. On the other hand, early harvested rootstocks (cuttings taken in December) for Cydomalus showed the best performance, with an 18.7 % difference between cuttings made in December and in March. Results from other evaluated rootstocks were not significant enough. In Experiment 3, the effect of chemical (phytohormone) stimulation and heat stimulations was compared. The best result was obtained by combinations of treatments without heat stimulations, when the cuttings were stored at 5°C and later treated with 0.25 % IBA in 50 % ethanol solution. The least rooting results, on the other hand,...
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
GC - Plant growing, crop rotation
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/QJ1210036" target="_blank" >QJ1210036: Enlargement of assortment of rootstocks for pip fruit and assortment of pears for new cultivars of Asian pears (from Pyrus pyrifolia NAKAI. a Pyrus ussuriensis MAXIM.)</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
ISSN
2464-8310
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
64
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
1211-1217
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—