All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The legality of the anti-migrant actions of the Italian and of the Hungarian governments: It is more than just law. The necessity to reform existing rules.

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F25940082%3A_____%2F21%3AN0000012" target="_blank" >RIV/25940082:_____/21:N0000012 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://hrcak.srce.hr/271029" target="_blank" >https://hrcak.srce.hr/271029</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.22598/iele.2021.8.2.1" target="_blank" >10.22598/iele.2021.8.2.1</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The legality of the anti-migrant actions of the Italian and of the Hungarian governments: It is more than just law. The necessity to reform existing rules.

  • Original language description

    This paper discusses the legal basis of those anti-migratory individual actions of certain states of the European Union, specifically Italy and Hungary, which have recently created a challenge to the enforcement of International and European Union legal rules on asylum. On the one side, legal rules are stemming from International Law, the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, EU Law (i.e. Dublin Regulation) which impose specific duties on those countries where migrants and asylum-seekers first come. On the other side, there are countries (i.e. Italy, Hungary) that are or have been particularly exposed to the inflow of refugees and asylum-seekers. These countries, in these last years, have taken individual initiatives against what their Governments have perceived as a massive inflow of migrants. These initiatives have spurred a debate and have also contributed to EU initiatives and plans related to the reallocation of migrants. This paper, after introducing the International and EU legal rules on the treatment of migrants and asylum-seekers, studies the legal basis for certain individual states’ initiatives against massive migration, and the possible consequences of a conflict between the EU/International authorities and those states following restrictive policies against migration. Finally, the paper suggests that the existing international and EU rules on asylum should be reviewed. This would also take into account the constraints that a massive inflow of migrants can create to individual states and would prevent conflicts between anti-migration national Governments and EU/International authorities.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    InterEULawEast

  • ISSN

    1849-3734

  • e-ISSN

    1849-4439

  • Volume of the periodical

    8

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    HR - CROATIA

  • Number of pages

    29

  • Pages from-to

    1-28

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85124664581