European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26068877%3A_____%2F25%3AN0000032" target="_blank" >RIV/26068877:_____/25:N0000032 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283825001812?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283825001812?via%3Dihub</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.011" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.011</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis
Original language description
Background and objective: The European Association of Urology urolithiasis guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary stone disease. Given the complexity and variability of stone formation, individualised patient management is emphasised. Methods: The guidelines incorporate evidence from the latest research and focus on risk assessment, imaging techniques, pharmacological management, and surgical interventions. A research librarian conducted literature searches for urolithiasis in the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase databases via Dialog-Datastar. The strength of recommendations is also rated. Key findings and limitations: Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical history, biochemical evaluation, and imaging, with ultrasound as the first-line modality and low-dose computed tomography as the gold standard for precise stone assessment. Stone composition and burden influence treatment decisions with algorithms primarily based on stone size, location, and composition. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are recommended for first-line pain management, with opioids reserved as a secondary option. Medical expulsive therapy with a-blockers may be considered for selected patients with ureteral stones. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy remain the primary intervention modalities, with selection based on stone characteristics and patient ing is recommended for high-risk patients to guide personalised treatment. Conclusions and clinical implications: The guidelines provide a framework for clinical decision-making while acknowledging the need for continued advances in urolithiasis. (c) 2025 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30217 - Urology and nephrology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
EUROPEAN UROLOGY
ISSN
0302-2838
e-ISSN
1873-7560
Volume of the periodical
88
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
12
Pages from-to
64-75
UT code for WoS article
001513127500016
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105003288230