All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26296080%3A_____%2F21%3AN0000016" target="_blank" >RIV/26296080:_____/21:N0000016 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/62156489:43210/21:43918115 RIV/00216224:14310/21:00121002

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production

  • Original language description

    Many farms run livestock production along with a biogas plant. Priority is the effort to prepare high-quality feed and high-quality feedstock for the biogas plant. However, deciding which harvesting technique to choose seems a difficult task. In this study, the influence of harvest technique on silage quality and thus on the methane yield during anaerobic digestion was investigated. Maize was harvested for silage and shredlage production. Two-year results showed that the chemical composition of water leachate from silage and the total solids content did not indicate any significant differences between maize silage and shredlage. Methane yield in the first year ranged from 0.2735 ± 0.0095 m3/kgVS (maize silage) to 0.3024 ± 0.0090 m3/kgVS (shredlage) and in the second year from 0.3047 ± 0.0110 m3/kgVS (maize silage) to 0.3147 ± 0.0086 m3/kgVS (shredlage). Methane concentration in biogas did not show any significant differences for the two types of harvesting techniques in both years. The results showed that harvest technique had no additional effect on the methane content in biogas and thus on the methane yield.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40101 - Agriculture

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    BIOENERGY RESEARCH

  • ISSN

    1939-1234

  • e-ISSN

    1939-1242

  • Volume of the periodical

    14

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    303-312

  • UT code for WoS article

    000554441500001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85088833788