All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Hopes of Derrida’s Reading? On Emergence of Peirce’s Texts in the Poststructuralist Context

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F17%3AN0000011" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/17:N0000011 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Hopes of Derrida’s Reading? On Emergence of Peirce’s Texts in the Poststructuralist Context

  • Original language description

    The chapter focuses on the problem of divergent (and eventually misleading) interpretations of Ch. S. Peirce’s texts presented by leading philosophical figures of the ‘70 and the ’80, such as Jacques Derrida, Gilles Deleuze and Umberto Eco. The poststructuralist re-discovery of Peirce’s semiotics seemed to be a possible “cure” for the totalitarian “disease” of structuralism. Trying to find a way out of “dying” structuralism, the poststructuralists upraised Peirce to one of the main sources of their philosophical inspiration. Thanks to them, Peirce became an attractive, frequent and influential reading for various contemporary semioticians of photographic image, like Rosalind Krauss, Thierry de Duve, Henri Van Lier or Jean-Marie Schaeffer. According to the author’s claim, this situation gave birth to various poststructuralist interpretations that made up Peirce’s texts in order to fit it in poststructuralist context of thinking. On the example of Derrida’s reading of Peirce, the paper analysis poststructuralist intentions, expectations and hopes that shaped these interpretations. Finally, the author points out several distinctions between Peirce’s semiotics and semiotics of poststructuralism (that should be seen as eventual reasons for poststructuralist disappointment by Peirce’s metaphysics).

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GP14-14237P" target="_blank" >GP14-14237P: Deconstructing Signature : Metaphysical Dimension of Legal Mediation Politics</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    How to Make Our Signs Clear: C. S. Peirce and Semiotics

  • ISBN

    9789004347786

  • Number of pages of the result

    15

  • Pages from-to

    119-133

  • Number of pages of the book

    172

  • Publisher name

    Brill

  • Place of publication

    Leiden

  • UT code for WoS chapter