Re-visioning morality and progress in the security domain: insights from humanitarian prohibition politics

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F17%3AN0000015" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/17:N0000015 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/00216208:11230/18:10380947

Result on the web

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fs41311-017-0082-4" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fs41311-017-0082-4</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0082-4" target="_blank" >10.1057/s41311-017-0082-4</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Re-visioning morality and progress in the security domain: insights from humanitarian prohibition politics

Original language description

This article offers a novel understanding and theorization of humanitarian disarmament regimes and their related prohibition politics. In doing so, it utilizes a power-analytical framework and puts in use four conceptions of power: productive, structural, institutional, and compulsory. Empirically, two potent humanitarian prohibition regimes that have been formed during the last two decades are examined. The ban of anti-personnel landmines (APLs) in 1997 marked a significant shift in humanitarian disarmament. Consequently, a humanitarian disarmament model emerged, consisting in bypassing permanent arms-control fora (“The Ottawa Process”). The ascent of the model to the arena traditionally dominated by power interests of major powers and ossified lowest-common denominator consensus was confirmed in 2008 when cluster munitions (CMs) were prohibited in a very similar fashion (“The Oslo Process”). The main contribution to the topic is the application of the power-analytical framework specifically developed to suit an analysis of formation and workings of global prohibition regimes, including heterarchy-of-power discussion of the relationship between states and non-state actors. Then, instead of the usual—and flawed at best—heroic discussions of victories of global civil society in relation to the establishment of regimes, rise of moral International Relations, and supposed progressivist teleology, a more complex picture with many contradictions, artefacts, and their layering inside and about those regimes looms large.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

50601 - Political science

Project

<a href="/en/project/GA16-02288S" target="_blank" >GA16-02288S: Anatomy of Revisionism and Its Impact on (Sub-)Regional Institutionalisations and Alliances</a><br>

Continuities

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year

2017

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

International Politics

ISSN

1384-5748

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

2018

Issue of the periodical within the volume

19

Country of publishing house

GB - UNITED KINGDOM

Number of pages

20

Pages from-to

1-20

UT code for WoS article

000445907200007

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85032376637