All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

SUPREME JUDICIAL COUNCILS AS A GUARANTEE OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIAL POWER AND THEIR ROLE IN THE APPOINTMENT AND CAREER ADVANCEMENT OF JUDGES

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F22%3A10152416" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/22:10152416 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://tlq.ilaw.cas.cz/index.php/tlq/article/view/517" target="_blank" >https://tlq.ilaw.cas.cz/index.php/tlq/article/view/517</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    SUPREME JUDICIAL COUNCILS AS A GUARANTEE OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIAL POWER AND THEIR ROLE IN THE APPOINTMENT AND CAREER ADVANCEMENT OF JUDGES

  • Original language description

    In recent decades, special attention has been devoted, within the framework of the constitutional conception of the separation of powers, to the systemic independence of judicial power. The main goal is to minimise the organisational and personal influence of executive power, that is, cabinets and ministries of justice. Immediately after World War II, the constitutional solution used by the French and Italians introduced the concept of &quot;supreme judicial councils&quot; as special central authorities of an administrative type. This is an institution that is essentially independent of executive power, generally made up of judges or other justice officials. The function of these institutions, which are in place in over fifteen constitutional democracies in Europe, especially comes into play during decision-making on the professional/personal matters of judicial candidates, during their training for their role and likewise when choosing them. In this sense, these &quot;supreme judicial councils&quot; decide on the selection criteria for judges essentially defined in every constitutional system via applicable laws. However, the councils have a fundamental role in the implementation of these criteria, as well as in judge selection itself. The constitutional systems in which these councils operate have also succeeded in minimising the influence of calculated personal politics by the executive power in relation to court functionaries, which is of fundamental importance above all for decision-making on judges&apos; progression to the higher courts, but is also important for the actual appointment of judges for governing positions at every level of the court system. There is also a need to monitor the independence and essential autonomy of the court system when handling punitive and disciplinary matters relating to judges.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    The Lawyer Quarterly

  • ISSN

    1805-8396

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    12

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3/2022

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    243-261

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85140125355