Understanding region formation through proximity, interests, and identity: debunking the Indo-Pacific as a viable regional demarcation
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F24%3A10152609" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/24:10152609 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2018.1540497" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2018.1540497</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2023.2300976" target="_blank" >10.1080/09512748.2023.2300976</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Understanding region formation through proximity, interests, and identity: debunking the Indo-Pacific as a viable regional demarcation
Original language description
The Indo-Pacific region, linking the Indian and Pacific Oceans through Southeast Asia, is becoming increasingly significant in academic discourse and global politics. The geopolitical background of the idea is evident as it connects several major powers around China. However, can the concept serve as a cornerstone for a viable regional setting beyond geopolitics? And in extension, why do some regions institutionalize while others are unable to do the same? Drawing on social constructivism and region-building theories, we argue that three intersubjectively shared preconditions-proximity, interests, and identity-play a crucial role in regional consolidation. We posit that this framework operates as a scale, wherein meeting these conditions positively influences region formation and institutionalization. Comparing the Indo-Pacific to the Asia-Pacific and Southeast Asia, we contend that while the latter two possessed these components, the Indo-Pacific severely lacks shared ideas of proximity and identity, and the component of interests remains contested. We conclude that this limitation significantly hampers the possibility of the Indo-Pacific emerging as a viable and intersubjectively shared regional framework.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50601 - Political science
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
The Pacific Review
ISSN
0951-2748
e-ISSN
1470-1332
Volume of the periodical
37
Issue of the periodical within the volume
6
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
23
Pages from-to
1067-1089
UT code for WoS article
001136216800001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85181439859