All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Understanding region formation through proximity, interests, and identity: debunking the Indo-Pacific as a viable regional demarcation

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F24%3A10152609" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/24:10152609 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2018.1540497" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2018.1540497</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2023.2300976" target="_blank" >10.1080/09512748.2023.2300976</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Understanding region formation through proximity, interests, and identity: debunking the Indo-Pacific as a viable regional demarcation

  • Original language description

    The Indo-Pacific region, linking the Indian and Pacific Oceans through Southeast Asia, is becoming increasingly significant in academic discourse and global politics. The geopolitical background of the idea is evident as it connects several major powers around China. However, can the concept serve as a cornerstone for a viable regional setting beyond geopolitics? And in extension, why do some regions institutionalize while others are unable to do the same? Drawing on social constructivism and region-building theories, we argue that three intersubjectively shared preconditions-proximity, interests, and identity-play a crucial role in regional consolidation. We posit that this framework operates as a scale, wherein meeting these conditions positively influences region formation and institutionalization. Comparing the Indo-Pacific to the Asia-Pacific and Southeast Asia, we contend that while the latter two possessed these components, the Indo-Pacific severely lacks shared ideas of proximity and identity, and the component of interests remains contested. We conclude that this limitation significantly hampers the possibility of the Indo-Pacific emerging as a viable and intersubjectively shared regional framework.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    The Pacific Review

  • ISSN

    0951-2748

  • e-ISSN

    1470-1332

  • Volume of the periodical

    37

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    6

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    23

  • Pages from-to

    1067-1089

  • UT code for WoS article

    001136216800001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85181439859