All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Freedom of expression of judges and its limitations in the context of the right to an impartial court in the Czech and European context

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F25%3A10152706" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/25:10152706 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06504-9_11" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06504-9_11</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06504-9_11" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-032-06504-9_11</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Freedom of expression of judges and its limitations in the context of the right to an impartial court in the Czech and European context

  • Original language description

    In his contribution, the author deals with the complex interconnection between the freedom of expression of judges and the imperative of maintaining an impartial court, both in the Czech legal framework as well as in the broader European context. Freedom of expression, which is an integral part of democratic society, is not absolute and can be limited in the interest of preserving other fundamental rights. This applies even more so to judges, who, due to their professional position, are obliged to observe the established rules of their conduct. The author therefore first of all presents the standards of judicial conduct in general terms and examines how the freedom of expression of judges, limited by the nature of their profession, intersects with the right to an impartial court. At the European level, the author points out the fact that the European Convention on Human Rights forms a key background and reflects on the delicate balance between the right of judges to freedom of expression and the need for an impartial judiciary. In addition, the author refers to the case law of the European Court of Human Rights concerning subjective and objective tests of judicial impartiality. The author also examines the Czech legal context, detailing the constitutional and statutory provisions relating to the conduct of judges. In this context, the author presents two practical cases concerning the expressions of judges in contravention of their required standard of conduct.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    C - Předmět řešení projektu podléhá obchodnímu tajemství (§ 504 Občanského zákoníku), ale název projektu, cíle projektu a u ukončeného nebo zastaveného projektu zhodnocení výsledku řešení projektu (údaje P03, P04, P15, P19, P29, PN8) dodané do CEP, jsou upraveny tak, aby byly zveřejnitelné.

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    The Freedom of Expression for Judges in the Sphere of the Judicial Ethics

  • ISBN

    978-3-032-06503-2

  • Number of pages of the result

    13

  • Pages from-to

    149-161

  • Number of pages of the book

    313

  • Publisher name

    Springer, Cham

  • Place of publication

    Švýcarsko

  • UT code for WoS chapter