Comparison Among Monte Carlo Based Burnup Codes Applied to the GFR Demonstrator ALLEGRO
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26722445%3A_____%2F18%3AN0000173" target="_blank" >RIV/26722445:_____/18:N0000173 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.avantipublishers.com/downloads/gjetruv5a1/" target="_blank" >https://www.avantipublishers.com/downloads/gjetruv5a1/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15377/2409-5818.2018.05.1" target="_blank" >10.15377/2409-5818.2018.05.1</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison Among Monte Carlo Based Burnup Codes Applied to the GFR Demonstrator ALLEGRO
Original language description
This paper aims to compare three Monte Carlo (MC) burnup based codes, i.e. MCNP6, Monteburns and Serpent on a future prototype reactor, named ALLEGRO, based on Gas cooled Fast Reactor (GFR) technology. GFR reactors are one of the proposed Generation-IV fast reactors; ALLEGRO facility is scheduled to be built in Europe as a GFR demonstrator, so its deepened simulation can help in its future development. The present study follows other researches already performed and aims to exhibit the different approaches in burnup calculations applied to a gas cooled fast reactors, i.e. this paper would like to show and to compare some results concerning nuclear parameters as keff and flux spectra, as well as the mass inventories versus burnup for some nuclides evaluated with different Monte Carlo codes. From obtained results, it seems to exist some differences in evaluation of nuclear parameters, mainly in effective multiplication factor and in mass inventories. The remaining differences are mainly related to calculation time: indeed between the fastest, that is SERPENT, and the slowest, that are MCNP6 and MONTEBURNS, the differences are about one order of magnitude. As far as precision is concerned, it was considered the standard only for effective multiplication factor and it seems that all codes are in good agreement.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>ost</sub> - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20305 - Nuclear related engineering; (nuclear physics to be 1.3);
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Global Journal of Energy Technology Research Updates
ISSN
2409-5818
e-ISSN
2409-5818
Volume of the periodical
5
Issue of the periodical within the volume
January
Country of publishing house
PK - PAKISTAN
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
1-10
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—