All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison Among Monte Carlo Based Burnup Codes Applied to the GFR Demonstrator ALLEGRO

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26722445%3A_____%2F18%3AN0000173" target="_blank" >RIV/26722445:_____/18:N0000173 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.avantipublishers.com/downloads/gjetruv5a1/" target="_blank" >https://www.avantipublishers.com/downloads/gjetruv5a1/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15377/2409-5818.2018.05.1" target="_blank" >10.15377/2409-5818.2018.05.1</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison Among Monte Carlo Based Burnup Codes Applied to the GFR Demonstrator ALLEGRO

  • Original language description

    This paper aims to compare three Monte Carlo (MC) burnup based codes, i.e. MCNP6, Monteburns and Serpent on a future prototype reactor, named ALLEGRO, based on Gas cooled Fast Reactor (GFR) technology. GFR reactors are one of the proposed Generation-IV fast reactors; ALLEGRO facility is scheduled to be built in Europe as a GFR demonstrator, so its deepened simulation can help in its future development. The present study follows other researches already performed and aims to exhibit the different approaches in burnup calculations applied to a gas cooled fast reactors, i.e. this paper would like to show and to compare some results concerning nuclear parameters as keff and flux spectra, as well as the mass inventories versus burnup for some nuclides evaluated with different Monte Carlo codes. From obtained results, it seems to exist some differences in evaluation of nuclear parameters, mainly in effective multiplication factor and in mass inventories. The remaining differences are mainly related to calculation time: indeed between the fastest, that is SERPENT, and the slowest, that are MCNP6 and MONTEBURNS, the differences are about one order of magnitude. As far as precision is concerned, it was considered the standard only for effective multiplication factor and it seems that all codes are in good agreement.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>ost</sub> - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20305 - Nuclear related engineering; (nuclear physics to be 1.3);

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Global Journal of Energy Technology Research Updates

  • ISSN

    2409-5818

  • e-ISSN

    2409-5818

  • Volume of the periodical

    5

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    January

  • Country of publishing house

    PK - PAKISTAN

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    1-10

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database