All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Methodology of 63Cu(n,2n)62Cu Reaction Rate Measurement

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26722445%3A_____%2F21%3AN0000045" target="_blank" >RIV/26722445:_____/21:N0000045 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/nuclearengineering/article-abstract/7/2/024503/1086482/Methodology-of-63Cu-n-2n-62Cu-Reaction-Rate?redirectedFrom=fulltext" target="_blank" >https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/nuclearengineering/article-abstract/7/2/024503/1086482/Methodology-of-63Cu-n-2n-62Cu-Reaction-Rate?redirectedFrom=fulltext</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4048236" target="_blank" >10.1115/1.4048236</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Methodology of 63Cu(n,2n)62Cu Reaction Rate Measurement

  • Original language description

    This paper presents the measurement of the spectrum-averaged cross section (SACS) of 63Cu(n,2n)62Cu reaction in 252Cf spontaneous fission neutron spectrum. The SACS in the 252Cf spectrum was chosen as a validation tool since 252Cf is the only standard neutron field and 62Cu isotope is not easy to measure by gamma spectroscopy since the gamma line of interest is an annihilation peak, which is also produced by 64Cu isotope. Fortunately, contributions to the annihilation peak from these isotopes can be distinguished due to the very different half-lives. SACS was inferred from the experimental reaction rate. The SACS in the 252Cf spontaneous fission neutron field for the 63Cu(n,2n)62Cu reaction was determined as equal to (0.1763 ± 0.0077 mb). This value agrees with value (0.183 ± 0.007) × 10−3 b within uncertainty presented by W. Mannhart. However, it differs by 12.7% from IRDFF-II value, which is equal to (0.19874 ± 8.954 10−3) × 10−3 b. Furthermore, reasonable agreement is not achieved with ENDF/B-VIII.0, JEFF-3.3, CENDL-3.1, ROSFOND-2010, nor JENDL-4.0 nuclear data libraries.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20305 - Nuclear related engineering; (nuclear physics to be 1.3);

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/LQ1603" target="_blank" >LQ1603: Research for SUSEN</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science

  • ISSN

    2332-8983

  • e-ISSN

    2332-8975

  • Volume of the periodical

    7

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    4

  • Pages from-to

    1-4

  • UT code for WoS article

    000630005800015

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85097463292