Evaluation of Safety Formats for Structural Assessment Based on Nonlinear Analysis
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F28399269%3A_____%2F18%3AN0000005" target="_blank" >RIV/28399269:_____/18:N0000005 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/68407700:21610/18:00321630
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324389439_Evaluation_of_Safety_Formats_for_Structural_Assessment_Based_on_Nonlinear_Analysis" target="_blank" >https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324389439_Evaluation_of_Safety_Formats_for_Structural_Assessment_Based_on_Nonlinear_Analysis</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Evaluation of Safety Formats for Structural Assessment Based on Nonlinear Analysis
Original language description
fib Model Code 2010 introduced for the first time a comprehensive system for the treatment of safety and uncertainty for structural assessment and design based by nonlinear analysis. The paper analyzes a selected example from the literature with shear failure when two different failure modes are observed depending on the choice of material parameters. This issue is critical for the global assessment by nonlinear analysis since it often involves assumptions about the statistical distribution of structural strength. When different failure modes are involved, i.e. by steel yielding or concrete failure, these assumptions may not be valid and the calculated design strength may not be on the safe side. The influence of different failure modes on the structural strength is evaluated mainly for the ECOV method, where the assumption of log-normal distribution is used. The global assessment by nonlinear analysis is compared with the analytical solutions based on standard Eurocode and Model Code 2010 shear formulas. The results show that even though the ECOV methods provides higher design strength values, the difference is not significant especially if one takes into account the overall uncertainties involved in reinforced concrete analysis and design.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20101 - Civil engineering
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA16-04132S" target="_blank" >GA16-04132S: Epistemic uncertainty of crack models in reinforced concrete structures</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures: Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Modelling of Concrete and Concrete Structures (EURO-C 2018)
ISBN
9781138741171
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
669-678
Publisher name
CRC Press/Balkema
Place of publication
Leiden, Tthe Netherlands
Event location
Bad Hofgastein, Austria
Event date
Feb 26, 2018
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—