All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

2016 Amendment of the Czech Significant Market Power Act of 2009

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F29142890%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000033" target="_blank" >RIV/29142890:_____/16:N0000033 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/yars2016_9_14/227.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/yars2016_9_14/227.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2016.9.14.11" target="_blank" >10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2016.9.14.11</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    2016 Amendment of the Czech Significant Market Power Act of 2009

  • Original language description

    The Significant Market Power Act (SMPA) adopted in 2009 regulates the assessment of, and the prevention of, the abuse of market power in the sale of agricultural and food products. The Act generated many controversies from the outset, survived legislative proposals for its abolition, to be finally amended in 2016. However, this kind of legislation failed to solve most of the problems and even managed to create additional controversies. The new amendment formally simplified the actual wording of the SMPA by transposing its numerous earlier appendixes, which contained an exemplary list of prohibited forms of SMP abuse, to the actual text of the Act. It also improved transparency and clarity with respect to its earlier vague and ambiguous terminology. At the same time, the amendment seriously modified the scope and principal philosophy of the SMPA by removing the previously required “substantial detriment to economic competition” as the pre-condition of the applicability of the Act. However, since the enforcement of the SMPA falls into the scope of the activities of the Czech Office for Protection of Economic Competition (in Czech Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže, UOHS), the concerns and doubts of the business community continue to grow whether this form of regulation is appropriate after the modification of the concept.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    AG - Legal sciences

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    YEARBOOK OF ANTITRUST AND REGULATORY STUDIES (YARS)

  • ISSN

    1689-9024

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    9

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    14

  • Country of publishing house

    PL - POLAND

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    227-245

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database