Contextualizing community-based landslide risk reduction: an evolutionary perspective
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13440%2F19%3A43893965" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13440/19:43893965 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10346-018-1099-5" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10346-018-1099-5</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1099-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10346-018-1099-5</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Contextualizing community-based landslide risk reduction: an evolutionary perspective
Original language description
Following the current emphasis given to communitybased action in landslide disaster risk reduction (DRR) and with reference to traditional community-based approaches, recent studies have increasingly addressed regionally diverse experiences with community engagement in DRR. In this paper, we question the mechanisms of the community-based landslide DRR throughout history. To do this, we use the original historical landslide database for NW Czechia spanning from 1531 to the present day, including 230 landslide events. Five historical periods with different political regimes and socio-economic conditions are illustrated with significant landslide phases (1770, 1895-1900, 1925-1928, 1955-1960) and individual socio-economically relevant landslides (1994). For each period, the institutional and social conditions are described, the landslide phase is characterized (number of events, triggers, impacts, and recovery) along with analyses of individual case study events, and finally the institutional analyses of stakeholders dealing with landslide recovery and future prevention are provided. We conclude that various conceptualizations of community may be assigned to individual historical periods and that the inherited and newly established practices have been combined, creating hybrid models of community-based landslide DRR and affecting both its efficiency and effectiveness. Based on our findings we argue that (i) further attention should be paid to understanding the institutional, social, and technological context that is permissive of certain approaches to community engagement; (ii) approaches to community engagement must be constantly re-evaluated, given the dynamic nature of communities' structure and functioning; and (iii) eventual use of the traditional or historical community-based approaches and practices must be critically evaluated with respect to conditions, in which these approaches and practices were developed and transformed. Finally, we emphasize that these challenges should be explored by interdisciplinary studies employing documentary data and addressing long-term path-dependencies of DRR in specific environmental and institutional settings.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10508 - Physical geography
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA16-02521S" target="_blank" >GA16-02521S: Individual and organizational decision-making in environmental risk reduction: determinants, motivations and efficiency</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Landslides
ISSN
1612-510X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
16
Issue of the periodical within the volume
9
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
1-16
UT code for WoS article
000482448500011
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85056319907