All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Approaches to state flood recovery funding in Visegrad Group Countries

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13440%2F20%3A43894744" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13440/20:43894744 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/44555601:13510/20:43894744

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2019.1667749" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2019.1667749</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2019.1667749" target="_blank" >10.1080/17477891.2019.1667749</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Approaches to state flood recovery funding in Visegrad Group Countries

  • Original language description

    Flood recovery is an important period in the flood risk management cycle. Recently, flood recovery has become viewed as an opportunity for future flood damage mitigation. Financial flows to cover flood damages and rules regarding their allocation are crucial for supporting or undermining mitigation efforts. In this paper, we map and compare state flood recovery funding in the so-called Visegrad Group Countries (V4), i.e. Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, over the past 30 years of their democratic history. We apply a qualitative comparative approach to identify differences and similarities in risk sharing and state flood recovery funding approaches among these countries. Additionally, we reveal how risk sharing is addressed by existing flood recovery funding schemes. The results indicate that national governments have a low willingness to institutionalise ex-ante compensation schemes. Ad hoc instruments initiated shortly after disastrous flooding usually do not provide incentives to reduce future flood damages.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/LTC18025" target="_blank" >LTC18025: LAND4FLOOD: Natural Flood Retention on Private Land</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Environmental hazards - human and policy dimensions

  • ISSN

    1747-7891

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    19

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    17

  • Pages from-to

    251-267

  • UT code for WoS article

    000489545300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85074355119