All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Too Often Biased

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13510%2F15%3A43886891" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13510/15:43886891 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2015-4-005" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2015-4-005</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2015-4-005" target="_blank" >10.15240/tul/001/2015-4-005</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Cost-Benefit Analysis: Too Often Biased

  • Original language description

    Cost-benefi t analysis (CBA) is widely applied in many countries in evaluating public projects and regulatory instruments. It is employed, for example, as a basis for decisions within the European Union's subsidy policy. CBA enables to express the comprehensive effect of a project or a governmental regulation on social welfare and thereby to introduce expertise to political decision-making. However, its practical applications face many problems. Different methodological choices in performing CBA enableto obtain diametrically opposite conclusions. Moreover, the way how investors apply for EU Fund subsidies encourages CBA performers to adjust CBA results to requirements of subsidy applicants. The unavoidable consequence is frequently mendacious, unreliable and misleading CBA. The paper brings an overview of the fl exibility in CBA methodological choices. It further focuses on analysing the CBA performance practice in the area of CBA project appraisal for the purposes of applying for EU

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    AE - Management, administration and clerical work

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    E+M. Ekonomie a Management

  • ISSN

    1212-3609

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    18

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    68-77

  • UT code for WoS article

    000368316100005

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database