What benefits are the most important to you, your community, and society? Perception of ecosystem services provided by nature-based solutions
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13510%2F22%3A43897053" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13510/22:43897053 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wat2.1612" target="_blank" >https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wat2.1612</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1612" target="_blank" >10.1002/wat2.1612</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
What benefits are the most important to you, your community, and society? Perception of ecosystem services provided by nature-based solutions
Original language description
Ecosystem services (ES) provided by nature-based solutions (NBS) have been examined using various data collection techniques and preference elicitation methods to understand what ES are important to human well-being. This article provides a systematic review of 153 scientific publications, with a focus on data collection techniques and perspectives of well-being used when eliciting preferences toward multiple ES provided by NBS. ES provided by urban parks, urban trees, and community gardens are the most commonly examined; however, generally specified NBS such as "green spaces" or "green infrastructure" prevail. The review further shows that the questionnaire surveys is the dominant technique for bringing evidence about the most preferred ES, followed by semi-structured interviews and workshops. Only a limited number of studies use revealed or stated preference methods as a part of data collection efforts such as a choice experiment or contingent valuation. Additionally, the review defines three different perspectives of well-being considered but rarely discussed in existing studies: individual; community; and society well-being perspectives. As the concept of well-being is hardly discussed in NBS literature and still depends on a large degree of subjectivity, this review highlights the need for future research that looks more deeply at individual, community, and social well-being, which is influenced differently by the implementation of NBS.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Wiley interdisciplinary reviews WIREs. Water
ISSN
2049-1948
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
9
Issue of the periodical within the volume
6
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
17
Pages from-to
1-17
UT code for WoS article
000847925600001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85137324685