How to assess reliability and validity of a traffic conflict technique?

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44994575%3A_____%2F12%3A%230001101" target="_blank" >RIV/44994575:_____/12:#0001101 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="http://www.ictct.org/workshop.php?workshop_nr=35" target="_blank" >http://www.ictct.org/workshop.php?workshop_nr=35</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

How to assess reliability and validity of a traffic conflict technique?

Original language description

Traffic conflicts are one of indirect safety measures. In order of their description, collection and evaluation, number of various traffic conflict techniques (TCTs) has been developed since the end of 1960s. The two key properties of every indicator are(Laureshyn, 2010) reliability and validity. The question is: is there a practical way to assess reliability and validity of a traffic conflict technique? It has been asked in relation with establishment of Czech TCT. There have been two Czech TCT approaches, both used mainly in academia: one has utilised manual observations, the second has relied on video recording and analysis in the office (Ambros, 2011). Current task is to compare the both and draw conclusions with regards to their applicability inpractice. (presented at 25th ICTCT workshop)

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

O - Miscellaneous

CEP classification

AQ - Safety and health protection, safety in operating machinery

OECD FORD branch

—

Project

Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

Continuities

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year

2012

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů