All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Evaluation of the Deterministic and Probabilistic Benchmark for the Advanced Pressurized Thermal Shock Analysis for Long Term Operation (Apal) Project

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46356088%3A_____%2F25%3AN0000013" target="_blank" >RIV/46356088:_____/25:N0000013 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/PVP/proceedings-abstract/PVP2025/89046/V001T01A104/1224792" target="_blank" >https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/PVP/proceedings-abstract/PVP2025/89046/V001T01A104/1224792</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/PVP2025-155331" target="_blank" >10.1115/PVP2025-155331</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Evaluation of the Deterministic and Probabilistic Benchmark for the Advanced Pressurized Thermal Shock Analysis for Long Term Operation (Apal) Project

  • Original language description

    The APAL project (Advanced PTS analyses for long term operation), launched in October 2020 under the EU's HORIZON 2020 program, aims to develop advanced probabilistic methods for assessing pressurized thermal shock ( PTS), quantify the impact of long-term operation (LTO) improvements and thermalhydraulic (TH) uncertainties on safety margins, and create bestpractice guidelines for PTS analysis. This paper summarizes findings from the deterministic benchmark (WP3) and the probabilistic benchmark (WP4). Various crack types, locations, fracture toughness concepts, and factors like LTO improvements and TH uncertainties were analyzed. The deterministic benchmark involved structural and fracture mechanics assessments of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) under PTS to harmonize results across different tools and quantify safety margins. The probabilistic benchmark (WP4) assessed the same cases, focusing on calculating the conditional probability of crack initiation (CPI) and failure (CPF). A key objective was comparing probabilistic and deterministic safety margins, particularly regarding maximum allowable adjusted reference temperature (ART), RPV lifetime, and reliability index. This paper presents comparisons and key insights from both benchmark studies.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20305 - Nuclear related engineering; (nuclear physics to be 1.3);

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP

  • ISBN

    978-0-7918-8904-6

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    1-10

  • Publisher name

    ASME

  • Place of publication

  • Event location

    Montreal, Canada

  • Event date

    Jul 20, 2025

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    001611951600104