All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Survey on the socio-economic and environmental impact of Wetland+®

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24310%2F24%3A00012322" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24310/24:00012322 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/46747885:24620/24:00012322

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7571" target="_blank" >https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7571</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7571" target="_blank" >10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7571</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Survey on the socio-economic and environmental impact of Wetland+®

  • Original language description

    Sustainable remediation demonstrates that the benefit of undertaking remediation is more significant than its impact, and the optimum remediation solution is selected through a balanced decision-making process. Assessing sustainable remediation is site and project-specific and is strongly multifactorial across a wide range of categories, which may or may not be readily quantifiable. The applied socio-economic survey framework is based on the 2020 SuRF-UK guidance. The assessment was carried out in three steps. A small core team, an interim evaluation by the project of all beneficiaries, and a final assessment including the views of a broad range of external stakeholders developed an initial „pilot” sustainability assessment. The sustainability assessment process compared options across 45 individual criteria in 15 overarching „headline” categories: environmental, social, and economic. Members selected suitable criteria and the individual rankings of the project consortium from research, service providers and the site owner. The assessments compared Wetland+® with the WWTP and no-intervention scenario. Wetland+® outranked the use of WWTP, and both performed significantly better than the no-intervention scenario. The quantitative data from LCA confirmed the results devoted to environmental impact.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20701 - Environmental and geological engineering, geotechnics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Environmental Engineering

  • ISSN

    0733-9372

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    150

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    8

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    001247589300009

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85195568373