All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Validity and reliability of a single-beam sensor for assessment of jump performance

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24510%2F24%3A00013218" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24510/24:00013218 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61989592:15510/24:73627083

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.240307" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.240307</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.240307" target="_blank" >10.26773/mjssm.240307</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Validity and reliability of a single-beam sensor for assessment of jump performance

  • Original language description

    This study aimed to establish the validity and reliability of a single-beam sensor for assessment of jump performance. Thirty-four male and female university students (age: 21.47 ± 0.98 years; height: 173.97 ± 9.32 cm; weight: 70.03 ± 10.63 kg) executed three trials of countermovement jump (CMJ) and three trials of squat jump (SJ), respectively. CMJ and SJ were simultaneously recorded using a force platform (reference) and single- beam jump sensor (Jump Pro). The flight time (FT) and jump height (JH) for both jumps were utilized for analyses. Results revealed the following for FT in CMJ performance: 1) Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) with lower limit (LL) and upper limit (UL) = 0.90 (0.82, 0.94); 2) Typical error of estimate (TEE) with LL and UL = 0.03 (0.01, 0.02); 3) Bland-Altman estimate = 0.05; and 4) Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.80. On the other hand, JH in CMJ posted: 1) r = 0.96 (0.94, 0.98); 2) TEE = 2.07 (1.73, 2.62); 3) Bland-Altman estimate = 4.00; and 4) ICC = 0.71. In regards to FT in SJ, r = 0.96 (0.94, 0.98), TEE = 0.02 (0.01, 0.02), Bland-Altman estimate = 0.03, and, ICC = 0.88. Further, JH in SJ exhibited r = 0.96 (0.94 – 0.98), TEE = 1.84 (1.53, 2.32), Bland-Altman estimate = 3.55, and ICC = 0.86. These findings support Jump Pro as a valid and reliable tool for measurement of CMJ and SJ performances.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30306 - Sport and fitness sciences

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine

  • ISSN

    1800-8755

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    13

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    ME - MONTENEGRO

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    59-64

  • UT code for WoS article

    001186790700002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85191410770