All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

A Numerical Comparison of the Sensitivity of the Geometric Mean Method, Eigenvalue Method, and Best–Worst Method

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F47813059%3A19520%2F21%3AA0000189" target="_blank" >RIV/47813059:19520/21:A0000189 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/5/554" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/5/554</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/MATH9050554" target="_blank" >10.3390/MATH9050554</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    A Numerical Comparison of the Sensitivity of the Geometric Mean Method, Eigenvalue Method, and Best–Worst Method

  • Original language description

    In this paper, we compare three methods for deriving a priority vector in the theoretical framework of pairwise comparisons—the Geometric Mean Method (GMM), Eigenvalue Method (EVM) and Best–Worst Method (BWM)—with respect to two features: sensitivity and order violation. As the research method, we apply One-Factor-At-a-Time (OFAT) sensitivity analysis via Monte Carlo simulations; the number of compared objects ranges from 3 to 8, and the comparison scale coincides with Saaty’s fundamental scale from 1 to 9 with reciprocals. Our findings suggest that the BWM is, on average, significantly more sensitive statistically (and thus less robust) and more susceptible to order violation than the GMM and EVM for every examined matrix (vector) size, even after adjustment for the different numbers of pairwise comparisons required by each method. On the other hand, differences in sensitivity and order violation between the GMM and EMM were found to be mostly statistically insignificant.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10102 - Applied mathematics

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA21-03085S" target="_blank" >GA21-03085S: Supporting Decision Processes with Pairwise Comparisons and Data Mining</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Mathematics

  • ISSN

    2227-7390

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    9

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    1-13

  • UT code for WoS article

    000628360000001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database