Comparing global security regimes: a power-analytical synthesis

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F18%3AN0000003" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/18:N0000003 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fs41311-017-0089-x" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fs41311-017-0089-x</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0089-x" target="_blank" >10.1057/s41311-017-0089-x</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparing global security regimes: a power-analytical synthesis
Original language description
The aim of this article is to offer a synthesis of what is termed here a power-analytical approach to global security regimes. The considered and prominent cases of prohibition/regulatory security regimes fall into three security clusters: a humanitarian cluster (small arms and light weapons, anti-personnel landmines, and cluster munitions), a WMD cluster (chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons), and an “unconventional” cluster (drugs and cyber weapons). Drawing on the thorough theoretical and empirical approach, the following synthesis is structured—and regimes compared—along four major categories. These four categories have been distilled from the power-analytical approach and empirical workings of the respective regimes. They are: perennial relevance of productive power; contingent systems of differentiation; real/imagined military/security centrality; and manipulation of categories. Importantly, they allow us to capture the most prominent features among the rich variety of cases. Therefore, they are reflective of both conceptual vocabulary and the multiple empirical realities of the examined regimes, thus greatly contributing not only to the existing, yet piecemeal regimes theorisation but also to empirical variability across the board.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50601 - Political science

Project
<a href="/en/project/GA13-26485S" target="_blank" >GA13-26485S: Global Prohibition Regimes: Theoretical Refinement and Empirical Analysis</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)