Facing Migration Flows in the EU: The Cases of Spain and the Czech Republic: Different Views, Different Solutions
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F18%3AN0000050" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/18:N0000050 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://think.visegradfund.org/wp-content/uploads/Ferrero-Turrion_Facing-Migration-Flows-in-the-EU-The-Cases-of-Spain-and-the-Czech-Republic.pdf" target="_blank" >https://think.visegradfund.org/wp-content/uploads/Ferrero-Turrion_Facing-Migration-Flows-in-the-EU-The-Cases-of-Spain-and-the-Czech-Republic.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Facing Migration Flows in the EU: The Cases of Spain and the Czech Republic: Different Views, Different Solutions
Original language description
The presented policy paper addresses the difficulties the European Union (EU) faces in building a proper Common Migration and Asylum Policy. The author argues that the problem here lies in the different approaches towards migration held by EU member states. Different migratory traditions are one of the key issues related to the misunderstanding among the states. Their approaches are determined by their geographical locations and migration histories. The member states use the same concepts and terms when discussing migration; however, the meanings of these concepts and terms are not equivalent, as each state uses them differently. The main aim of this paper is to give some clarity to the positions held by Eastern and Southern states from a comparative perspective of the Czech Republic and Spain. Even though apparently, they hold opposite positions towards migration, the study finds that they share some common features such as a denial of being an asylum country and the absence of a related public policy. Probably the most important conclusion has to do with the fact that these two member states are appealing to a “selective solidarity principle” depending on the circumstances. In addition, this paper provides some recommendations to the Czech Republic based on the good practices and failures observed in the public policies implemented by Spain since the beginning of 2000 to improve the dialogue and understanding at the EU level. This analysis was produced within the Think Visegrad Non-V4 Fellowship programme, within which was Ruth Ferrero Turrión Visiting Researcher at the Institute of International Relations Prague.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50601 - Political science
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů