All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Speaking of hybrid warfare: Multiple narratives and differing expertise in the 'hybrid warfare' debate in Czechia

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F21%3AN0000016" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/21:N0000016 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00108367211000799" target="_blank" >https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00108367211000799</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00108367211000799" target="_blank" >10.1177/00108367211000799</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Speaking of hybrid warfare: Multiple narratives and differing expertise in the 'hybrid warfare' debate in Czechia

  • Original language description

    What do we speak of when we speak of ‘hybrid warfare’, a notion that has become prominent in discussions of European security? The article shows that this question is difficult to answer, as the hybrid warfare discourse is not only vague, but also consists of multiple, and at times contradictory, narratives. While talking and writing about supposedly the same thing, participants in the hybrid warfare debate often suggest markedly different ideas about the precise nature and target of the threat, offer different responses and draw upon different expertise. Grounding our argument in critical scholarship on narratives, security knowledge and hybrid warfare, we build a framework for studying security narratives around the four elements of threat, threatened value, response and underlying knowledge. This framework is utilised in a case study of Czechia, a country that has played a pioneering and outsized role in European hybrid warfare debates. We identify three narratives of hybrid warfare – defence, counterinfluence and education – which present markedly different understandings of ‘hybrid warfare’, and ways to defend against it. Our intervention hopes to contribute to disentangling the contradictions of the hybrid warfare discourse, itself a necessary precondition for both sound state policy and an informed public debate.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA19-12081S" target="_blank" >GA19-12081S: Transforming Security in the Age of Uncertainty: Understanding the Rise of Hybrid Warfare in the Czech Republic</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Cooperation and Conflict

  • ISSN

    0010-8367

  • e-ISSN

    1460-3691

  • Volume of the periodical

    56

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    22

  • Pages from-to

    432-453

  • UT code for WoS article

    000629712700001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85102491959