All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Against Grand Theories: A (Cautionary) Tale of Two Disciplines

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F20%3A43953666" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/20:43953666 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz/index.php/tv/article/view/470/538" target="_blank" >https://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz/index.php/tv/article/view/470/538</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46938/tv.2020.470" target="_blank" >10.46938/tv.2020.470</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Against Grand Theories: A (Cautionary) Tale of Two Disciplines

  • Original language description

    In this paper, I combine an exposition of the historical development of sociology and the philosophy of science from the era of grand theories onwards, with an explication as to why the grand theories have failed. First, I trace some parallels in the history of each of the disciplines. After presenting their chronological development, I scrutinize the metatheoretical findings about the disciplines and examine the main ontological and epistemic reasons why attempts at these general theories or frameworks have not succeeded. Among them are the lack of a universal methodology and of a theoretical core, together with the impossibility of achieving a common objective view. On this basis I conclude that general theories or frameworks are not achievable in principle. As it turns out, however, some contemporary social theorists and philosophers still harbor hopes that they can be successfully formulated, or at the least do not rule out such a possibility. Thus, in closing, I argue that the critical points can also be applied to these latest attempts, as the call for grand theories or frameworks has never ceased and returns regularly with each new generation of social theorists and philosophers of science.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA18-08239S" target="_blank" >GA18-08239S: Objectivity: An Experimental Approach to the Traditional Philosophical Question</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Teorie vědy. Theory of Science

  • ISSN

    1210-0250

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    42

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    25

  • Pages from-to

    175-199

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85098082553