All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Feyerabend’s Alternative Theories within Goodman’s Worldmaking

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F20%3A43957086" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/20:43957086 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.organonf.com/journal/orgf-2020-27302/" target="_blank" >https://www.organonf.com/journal/orgf-2020-27302/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31577/ORGF.2020.27302" target="_blank" >10.31577/ORGF.2020.27302</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Feyerabend’s Alternative Theories within Goodman’s Worldmaking

  • Original language description

    The main purpose of this paper is to compare two pluralistic approaches to knowledge, Goodman’s theory of worldmaking and Feyerabend’s methodological anarchism. It therefore examines firstly, the concept of world-versions, which according to Goodman create our worlds and at the same time are crucial for achieving a better understanding of reality; and secondly, the concept of alternative theories which are built upon pluralism and, according to Feyerabend, secure knowledge and make scientific progress possible. Feyerabend’s concept has been rejected by many, seemingly for its lack of limitations. In line with this argument, I propose that based on the comparison of these two pluralistic approaches, the alternative theories can be understood as a part of worldmaking, for Goodman’s theory has wider applicability since it encompasses not only science but also art. Furthermore, I suggest adopting Goodman’s principle of rightness, the criterion of functionality in his worldmaking, as a criterion within Feyerabend’s methodological anarchism when establishing the prevailing theory. It is to be expected that such a juxtaposition will uncover inconsistencies, in particular regarding boundless relativism and the vague terminology in both conceptions.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Organon F

  • ISSN

    1335-0668

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    27

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    SK - SLOVAKIA

  • Number of pages

    23

  • Pages from-to

    302-324

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85091357220