The Grand Theory Is Alive: An Interview with Jonathan H. Turner
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F21%3A43963585" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/21:43963585 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz/index.php/tv/article/view/519" target="_blank" >https://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz/index.php/tv/article/view/519</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46938/tv.2021.519" target="_blank" >10.46938/tv.2021.519</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The Grand Theory Is Alive: An Interview with Jonathan H. Turner
Original language description
Jonathan H. Turner is the Distinguished Professor of Sociology at the University of California at Riverside and, for many decades, the world’s leading authority on sociological theory, with research interests in many other areas such as human and societal evolution, social stratification and inequality, philosophy of science, and historical sociology. Professor Turner has authored, co-authored, edited, or co-edited a number of works, including more than 43 influential books, which have been published in twelve different languages, including The Structure of Sociological Theory, The Emergence of Sociological Theory, and many others. He is a member of the American Sociological Association and a former president of the Pacific Sociological Society and the journal editor for Sociological Theory. Professor Turner received a B.A. with honors from University of California at Santa Barbara, a M.A. and a doctorate in sociology from Cornell University. The interview is Professor Turner’s critical reply to the arguments raised in the article “Against Grand Theories: A (Cautionary) Tale of Two Disciplines,” which presents the view that universally accepted grand theories in social sciences are not achievable because of the lack of a common methodology or a theoretical core which results in their multiparadigmatic nature, value-leadenness and insufficient objectivity. The interview took place on March 23, 2021 online.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA18-08239S" target="_blank" >GA18-08239S: Objectivity: An Experimental Approach to the Traditional Philosophical Question</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů